Does research show that we are wasting our time trying to get people into training?

Research published by the Learning and Skills Network (LSN) looks at what motivates learners without a level 2 qualification to return to study.  ‘Triggers for Re-engagement’ http://tiny.cc/u2CS6 describes the findings and implications of a study that examined the factors that encourage unqualified adults to return to learning.  A survey of those involved in learning looked at why they had become involved, what barriers they had overcome to be able to participate and what benefits they perceived from having done the training.

The results do not make easy reading for organisations that are looking to encourage the more disadvantaged learners back into training.  The most common reason for returning to training was that they had been sent by work, and unsurprisingly the most common method of funding was from the employer.  Very few of those interviewed mentioned common barriers such as family or childcare as being an issue however ‘lack of time’ was cited by a number as a potential barrier.

When asked about the benefits of training, outcomes such as ‘could do my job better’ were the most widely stated positive responses, however the most common single response from men was that they had gained little from the training.  This raises issues about how the sector sells training to individuals and how they ensure that training has a positive impact on those undertaking it.

Finally the report highlights the outcome, that it describes as “most disappointing”, that the most significant barrier to engaging learners is not finance, time or not knowing what or where courses are available; it is simply that people do not see the need to learn.  It is essential that as a sector we recognise this fact and work with individuals to build an understanding of how learning can improve their lives, we need to develop ways of doing this, spread good practice and build up positive case studies that show how real people have benefited from the type of learning we provide.

This research is now three years old, are its findings still valid and how can the sector work to ensure that training is valued and accessible to everyone?

Posted by skillsmark on 22 September 2009 01:22 PM